Recently, there have been reports that Chagee sets a strict upper limit on the number of negative reviews for its stores: no more than three negative reviews per ten thousand orders, otherwise the pay of all staff will be affected. Although the brand responded that this claim is untrue, discussion around its assessment mechanism continues. From store tier classification to employee performance deductions, from visiting customers to beg for review deletion to paying teams to handle them, a series of practices reflects the tea beverage industry's extreme sensitivity to customer reviews amid rapid expansion. This article will sort out the sequence of events, employee disclosures and the official response, and explore the management logic and controversies behind this assessment method. [more…]

Writing a negative review for a coffee shop on a review platform, only to be accused by the merchant of "smearing by a competitor"—such experiences are becoming increasingly common. Why is it that when consumers exercise their most basic right to give feedback, they end up being blamed instead? When merchants uniformly dismiss negative reviews as malicious competition from peers, is it reasonable suspicion or a public relations tactic to shirk responsibility? Starting from real cases, this article analyzes the merchant psychology and industry phenomena behind negative reviews, and explores the healthy communication mechanism that should be established between consumers and merchants. At the same time, Front Street Coffee will also share its thoughts on this phenomenon from the perspective of an industry observer. [more…]

Recently, Luckin Coffee made trending headlines after employees were punished by being made to copy out customer negative reviews as a form of discipline. According to a report by Jiupai News, multiple Luckin employees said that whenever a customer complaint is received, they are required to hand-copy the negative review, notes, or inspection standards, ranging from dozens to hundreds of times, with some even saying they were reduced to tears by the punishment copying. Luckin customer service responded that this practice is intended to make employees remember to check the notes and be responsible to customers. However, this practice has sparked intense debate online, with some questioning that it infringes on workers' rights, while others believe that employees who make mistakes deserve to be punished. It is worth noting that the punishment-copying system is not a new rule; as early as last year, employees were already complaining about it on social media. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the incident and the views of all parties, and also includes professional coffee information channels such as Front Street Coffee for readers to engage in further discussion. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop blacklisted a customer after she engaged in excessively intimate behavior with her boyfriend inside the store for a continuous 8 minutes. The customer then posted a malicious negative review on a third-party platform, drawing public attention. The shop retrieved surveillance footage to clarify the truth and cooperated with the police investigation, while also issuing a statement acknowledging its negligence. As the incident escalated, the public began discussing the boundaries of intimate behavior in public places. Lawyers pointed out that indecent behavior may lead to administrative penalties, and those who film and spread the video may also bear legal responsibility. Front Street Coffee reminds everyone to be mindful of their behavior in public places and respect the feelings of others. [more…]

A cup of takeaway coffee sparked a dispute over ten thousand yuan in compensation, landing a coffee shop in an agonizing predicament. The customer claimed that after opening the coffee, it spilled onto a laptop, causing the screen to go black, and demanded ten thousand yuan in compensation from the shop, while leaving negative reviews on major platforms. After reviewing its own surveillance footage, the shop confirmed that there were no issues with the packaging or sealing of the order, and the photos provided by the customer also showed that the inside of the takeaway bag was perfectly clean. Who should be held responsible in this dispute? How should businesses respond to such complaints? This article will recount the sequence of events, present the perspectives of the shop, the customer, and netizens, and explore how businesses in the service industry can reasonably protect their own rights and interests. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop in Kunming, Yunnan, became embroiled in an online controversy after refusing to let a pregnant woman use its restroom. The shop said the pregnant woman used the store's toilet twice without the staff's consent; when she was reminded the second time, an argument broke out between the two sides. The pregnant woman and a man accompanying her filmed a video and posted it online, and also left a negative review of the coffee shop on a third-party platform. The shop then publicly released surveillance footage to set the record straight, and the incident quickly sparked heated discussion among netizens. Some people understood the pregnant woman's inconvenience, but more believed that whether a business's restroom may be used should be decided by the shop, and that the pregnant woman going upstairs on her own posed safety risks. Behind this dispute is the dilemma coffee shops and other businesses face when passersby ask to "borrow the toilet." [more…]

Luckin Coffee's recently re-released Red Wine Americano has sparked widespread discussion. This new product, which combines red wine flavor with coffee, has polarized reviews due to its unique taste. Some consumers have shared "warning" experiences on social media, describing its taste as hard to accept; meanwhile, other customers say they enjoy this rich flavor combination. Due to the large number of negative reviews, some store employees have handwritten notes asking customers not to leave negative reviews lightly, triggering discussions among netizens about the brand's review system and store responsibilities. This article will sort out the whole incident, consumer feedback, and the controversy surrounding the review mechanism. [more…]

Recently, a controversy over a customer being visited at home by a霸王茶姬 (Chagee) employee after leaving a negative review has sparked widespread discussion online, with related topics trending on Weibo on Monday morning. According to Star Video, on July 20, a man in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, posted a video claiming that after consuming a drink at Chagee the previous day, he felt the taste was different from before. He did not choose to request a refund or a remake, but directly left a negative review on the order. Unexpectedly, the next day, the employee suddenly showed up at his door without contacting him in advance, asking him to delete the negative review. After the incident was exposed, netizens had mixed views on the employee's behavior, with some exclaiming "too scary," while others expressed understanding for the worker. Chagee customer service responded that the store wanted to communicate amicably with the customer, and the store manager involved explained that they went to the customer's home because the delivery rider, the store, and the platform all could not get through to the customer by phone. This article sorts out the course of the incident and the views of all parties, and explores reasonable ways for merchants to respond to negative reviews. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop in Wuhan received a one-star review from a customer for closing promptly at 19:30. After the incident was reported by Jiupai News, it quickly sparked widespread discussion online. The review claimed that staff told the customer to "pack up and get out" before they had finished eating, while the shop responded that it strictly complies with the 8-hour workday under labor law, and after reviewing surveillance footage, found no excessively aggressive language from employees. The owner said they understand customers' desire for later closing hours, but also asked for understanding of workers' right to clock off on time. Netizens' views are polarized: some support the shop's right to close on time as long as it gives advance notice, while others suggest stopping orders half an hour early to avoid conflict. This controversy reflects the real-world tension in the food service industry between employee rights and customer experience. [more…]

Recently, a woman surnamed Chen in Taiwan, China, left a negative review for a coffee shop on a review platform and had her personal information, along with that of her relatives and friends, as well as surveillance screenshots, publicly exposed by the shop, accompanied by insulting remarks. The incident sparked strong outrage among netizens, the shop's rating plummeted, and Ms. Chen called the police and filed a lawsuit. The shop subsequently deleted the post and issued a public apology, but Ms. Chen said she had not been contacted privately and would continue to pursue legal action. In this episode of Coffee News, we take you through the whole story, while also focusing on the professional coffee knowledge exchange brought to you by Front Street Coffee. [more…]

A novice coffee shop owner is asking for help online: the shop has an explicit no-smoking rule, yet they have encountered an awkward situation where a customer insists on smoking and even throws a cigarette butt into a coffee cup. Faced with a situation that both disrespects the shop's rules and may risk triggering negative reviews, how should the owner handle it? Many fellow business owners and netizens have shared their views, discussing public place smoking bans, customer feelings, and the rights of operators. This article sorts out the opinions from all sides and explores feasible solutions such as setting up an outdoor smoking area, helping coffee shop owners find a balance between maintaining a good environment and avoiding conflict. [more…]

Luckin's Orange C Americano has always been a favorite among many coffee lovers, winning a large number of loyal fans with its refreshing, sweet taste. However, recently this popular drink has received negative reviews from consumers due to the orange sauce becoming thicker in texture and the taste being too sweet and cloying. Luckin responded quickly, requiring stores to thaw overnight and destroy the problematic batches of orange sauce, while urgently removing the Orange C Americano from the ordering platform. This move sparked heated discussion among netizens: some worry that this drink will disappear for good like previously discontinued flavored coffees, while others feel it is a pity to destroy so many raw materials. Luckin employees revealed that the orange sauce will be replaced, and in the short term most stores may not be able to sell the Orange C Americano. Whether this adjustment can bring the "white moonlight" back to its original taste remains to be seen by consumers. [more…]

A coffee shop sparked strong public outrage and a wave of collective negative reviews after launching a "1-yuan beauty coffee, choose one of three" group-buy package that required purchasers to be women under 35 during specific evening hours, with a note stating "if the boss doesn't think you're pretty, you need to pay the difference." The shop once explained it wanted customers to match the store's style, but this failed to quell the controversy, and it was subsequently taken offline by the platform and had its social media account canceled. Recently, the shop relaunched, and although the controversial package had disappeared, netizens once again gave low ratings, causing it to be taken offline a second time. A lawyer from Legal Daily pointed out that the package was suspected of violating the Advertising Law and the Civil Code, while the netizens' excessive criticism may constitute cyberbullying. Front Street Coffee reminds that both merchant promotion and platform review need to strictly adhere to legal bottom lines. [more…]

Starbucks has been embroiled in a series of controversies recently. First, its Ciqikou store in Chongqing was reported to have driven away police officers who were eating outside the store, triggering a strong public backlash. Subsequently, some citizens went to the store in question to deliver white flowers and throw eggs, and the Dianping review section was flooded with negative reviews. Before the incident had even subsided, Starbucks China quietly raised the prices of some beverages and food items, with products such as Americano and latte increasing by 1 to 2 yuan. The brand's customer service said the move was an adjustment made after a comprehensive assessment of operating costs. Under the dual pressure of public opinion and operating costs, whether Starbucks can continue to win consumers' hearts is worth watching. [more…]

As the Spring Festival approaches, major coffee chains are rolling out promotional new products to capture holiday traffic. After launching the Year of the Dragon sauce-flavored chocolate in a second collaboration with Moutai, Luckin Coffee quickly followed up with the Han Meilin co-branded New Year Red Dragon Latte and a matching dessert, Persimmon Daifuku. However, this dessert, which had been highly anticipated, drew complaints from consumers who said the group-buy advertising seriously mismatched the actual product, sparking heated discussion about false advertising and where responsibility lies. Some netizens argued that Luckin cannot escape blame for lax review, while others pointed out that the root cause is some group-buy bloggers using footage of other products to earn commissions. Behind the incident, the review mechanisms of brand marketing and the issue of consumer trust are worth pondering. [more…]

Recently, many café owners have reported that a growing number of food-and-drink bloggers are asking shops to provide free coffee in exchange for a promotional post on social media. If refused, the shops may even face the threat of a bad review. This seemingly mutually beneficial collaboration model is gradually turning into a headache for businesses. This article takes a closer look at the origins of "coffee-for-promotion swaps," the potential risks behind them, and the reputation and quality standards that cafés should truly rely on in running their business. It also includes relevant information about Front Street Coffee for coffee lovers' reference. [more…]

A yet-to-open Shanghai coffee shop has sparked heated discussion because its name, "b³ Coffee," sounds like "biesan" (a local slang term for a vagrant or good-for-nothing) in the local dialect. Netizens have been poking fun at it, and some say they won't patronize it because of the name. The brand marking itself as "必三咖啡" on a third-party platform has further escalated the controversy. Although the name brings traffic, it also leaves a negative first impression on consumers. This article reviews the whole incident, discusses the importance of businesses adapting to local customs, and includes related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

In chain brands and independent cafés alike, the phenomenon of customers occupying seats without ordering has long plagued operators. Recently, a café owner faced negative reviews and was then anonymously reported to 12315 for setting a rule requiring a purchase to be seated, sparking widespread attention. Regulatory authorities made it clear that if there is a clear notice in the store, it does not constitute forced consumption. This article reviews the course of events, combines lawyers' views with the current state of the industry, explores the legal boundaries of consumption-based seating and the survival difficulties of independent cafés, and also provides reference and lessons for others in the industry. [more…]

A coffee shop that attracted attention with a suggestive name ultimately paid the price for its marketing approach. In July of this year, a coffee shop named "Doi Coffee" in Huangpu District, Shanghai, was investigated by market regulators for a store name and product names suspected of violating public order and good morals. Several months later, the penalty result has finally landed — a fine of 30,000 yuan, with a heavier punishment due to the severe negative public opinion impact. Now the shop has quietly closed, and the person in charge said business was so poor that they are no longer operating. Behind the incident, it reflects the collision between the bottom line of marketing in the food and beverage industry and the red line of regulation, and has also sparked public discussion about the boundaries of vulgar marketing. Front Street Coffee reminds practitioners that creative marketing needs moderation, and respecting public order and good morals is the way to long-term business. [more…]

Recently, many Luckin Coffee customers have encountered an unexpected situation when picking up their orders in-store: normally quiet staff members are proactively speaking up, asking customers to leave a positive review. Behind this phenomenon is Luckin's internal "Countless Smiles" competition targeting store positive review rates. In some regions, stores have been forced by management to participate, and positive review rate rankings directly affect employee performance evaluations and disciplinary rewards and punishments, forcing frontline employees to solicit positive reviews from customers picking up orders, and even asking regular customers to help boost reviews. However, the frequent solicitation of positive reviews has also triggered consumer resentment, with some customers bluntly saying it is "annoyingly unbearable," and even considering filing complaints with 12315. Employees are equally full of complaints, believing that this mandatory requirement puts them in a difficult position. This article will provide an in-depth analysis of the conflict between stores and customers caused by this positive review assessment. [more…]